Battery Review – DXOMARK https://www.dxomark.com The leading source of independent audio, display, battery and image quality measurements and ratings for smartphone, camera, lens and wireless speaker since 2008. Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:23:44 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6.8 https://www.dxomark.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/logo-o-transparent-150x150.png Battery Review – DXOMARK https://www.dxomark.com 32 32 Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-a23-5g-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-a23-5g-battery-test/#respond Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:23:45 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=134025 We put the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 5000 mAh 25W charger (not included) [...]

The post Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
  • 25W charger (not included)
  • 6.6-inch, 1080 x 2408, 120 Hz, LCD display
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 64 GB + 4 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
129
battery
142
autonomy
152

189

141

195

127

198

113
charging
105

184

121

182

137

205

125

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 16h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h49
80% Charging time
Charging Time
1h45
Full charging time
Quick Boost
3h51 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Excellent management during idle, with low discharge current
  • Outstanding autonomy when calling
  • Excellent on-the-go performance overall
  • Very low residual consumption of the charger

Cons

  • Below-average autonomy when streaming video, with high discharge current
  • Poor charging experience

The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G reached a decent global score, higher than the Galaxy A13 5G and A33 5G,  mainly because of its excellent 2.5 days of  autonomy in moderate use. The device showed impressive performance during idle phases, losing only 1% per night on average. On-the-go autonomy was excellent, especially when calling and using the camera. However, the device struggled when streaming videos, draining high discharge currents.

The charging time was longer than average because of the small 25W charger. But the residual consumption of this power adapter was very low.
When compared with devices from the same price range, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G was just average, but its performance when calling and using the camera remained excellent.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G 5000mAh 25W
(not included)
- PLS LCD
1080 x 2408
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
Honor X8 5G 5000mAh 23W
(not included)
- TFT LCD
720 x 1600
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G 5000mAh 33W
(included)
- IPS
1080 x 2400
Mediatek Dimensity 810

Autonomy

142

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

182

Wiko Power U30
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
94h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
64h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
39h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

152

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

189

Vivo Y72 5G

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

141

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

127

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

113

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

181

Realme GT Neo 3
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
53%
in 30 min
0h49
0 - 80%
1h45
Full charge

Full charge

105

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

121

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

182

Realme GT Neo 3

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

129

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
3.6 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

137

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

125

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-a23-5g-battery-test/feed/ 0 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired BATTERY BATTERY
Sony Xperia 5 IV Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/sony-xperia-5-iv-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/sony-xperia-5-iv-battery-test/#respond Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:27:04 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=133893 We put the Sony Xperia 5 IV through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 5000 mAh 30W charger (not included) [...]

The post Sony Xperia 5 IV Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Sony Xperia 5 IV through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
  • 30W charger (not included)
  • 6.1-inch, 1080 x 2520, 120 Hz, OLED display
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 8 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Sony Xperia 5 IV
113
battery
120
autonomy
107

189

139

195

136

198

100
charging
94

184

107

182

110

205

126

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 9h
Battery life
Charging Time
1h05
80% Charging time
Charging Time
2h05
Full charging time
Quick Boost
2h50 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Decent autonomy, with more than 2 days in moderate use
  • Excellent autonomy on the go, especially when calling
  • Excellent autonomy when testing each usage separately (video, music, call, gaming)
  • Excellent power adapter efficiency
  • Very low residual consumption of the charger
  • Low discharge currents overall

Cons

  • Inaccurate battery gauge
  • Below-average autonomy in idle
  • Slow charging speed
  • Low autonomy recovered after a 5-minute charging
  • Poor charge efficiency

The Sony Xperia 5 IV’s battery performance finds itself between the Xperia 1 IV and the Xperia 10 IV. Its global score almost reached the average of our database, showing a way better performance than the Xperia 1 IV across almost all  use cases, but standing far behind the Xperia 10 IV and its outstanding autonomy.

Compared with devices from the same Ultra-premium price range ($800+), the Xperia 5 IV achieved a decent global score mainly because of its excellent autonomy and efficiency, but its charging performance was among the lowest. The 30W charger struggled to fill the large 5000 mAh battery. Its efficiency, however,  was excellent, and its residual consumption, among the lowest in our database, was well-managed.

When testing each usage separately, the the Sony Xperia 5 IV’s autonomy was always above average, and its performance on the go was just the same, especially when calling. The discharge currents were low on average, showing that the device was well-managed.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Sony Xperia 5 IV 5000mAh 30W
(not included)
15W OLED
1080 x 2520
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Sony Xperia 1 IV 5000mAh 30W
(not included)
15W OLED
1644 x 3840
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Apple iPhone 14 Pro 3200mAh 20W
(not included)
15W OLED
1179 x 2556
Apple A16 Bionic
Google Pixel 7 Pro 5000mAh 30W
(not included)
23W OLED
1440 x 3120
Google Tensor G2

Autonomy

120

Sony Xperia 5 IV

182

Wiko Power U30
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
80h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
57h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
36h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

107

Sony Xperia 5 IV

189

Vivo Y72 5G

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

139

Sony Xperia 5 IV

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

136

Sony Xperia 5 IV

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

100

Sony Xperia 5 IV

181

Realme GT Neo 3
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
44%
in 30 min
1h05
0 - 80%
2h05
Full charge

Full charge

94

Sony Xperia 5 IV

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

107

Sony Xperia 5 IV

182

Realme GT Neo 3

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

120

Sony Xperia 5 IV

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Sony Xperia 5 IV
4.4 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

110

Sony Xperia 5 IV

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

126

Sony Xperia 5 IV

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Sony Xperia 5 IV Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/sony-xperia-5-iv-battery-test/feed/ 0 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired BATTERY BATTERY
Vivo X80 Lite 5G Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/vivo-x80-lite-5g-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/vivo-x80-lite-5g-battery-test/#respond Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:01:03 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=132626 We put the Vivo X80 Lite 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 4500 mAh 44W charger (included) 6.44-inch, [...]

The post Vivo X80 Lite 5G Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Vivo X80 Lite 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 4500 mAh
  • 44W charger (included)
  • 6.44-inch, 1080 x 2404, 90 Hz, OLED display
  • MediaTek Dimensity 900 (6 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 256 GB + 8 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Vivo X80 Lite 5G
137
autonomy
153

189

98

195

131

198

126
charging
115

184

139

182

140

205

158

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 11h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h42
80% Charging time
Charging Time
1h04
Full charging time
Quick Boost
5h31 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Excellent autonomy in moderate use
  • Excellent autonomy in calibrated mode, especially when gaming, streaming music and videos
  • Decent charging speed
  • 5 hours and 31 minutes of autonomy recovered after charging for 5 minutes
  • Excellent charge and power adapter efficiency
  • Low discharge currents overall, except when on the go

Cons

  • Poor autonomy when calling
  • Very low autonomy when tested on the go
  • High residual consumption of the charger

The Vivo X80 Lite 5G attained an excellent global score thanks to its autonomy in moderate use and in calibrated mode, especially when gaming, streaming music and videos. But when tested on the go, the device struggled to maintain power and had a very low autonomy.

The charging performance was decent with the 44W charger. It took slightly more than an hour to fully charge the device. The autonomy recovered after a 5-minute charge was 5 hours and 31 minutes, higher than the average.
The Vivo X80 Lite 5G also received an excellent efficiency score. Indeed, the discharge currents were very low overall (except when tested on the go), meaning that the device was well-optimized. The charge efficiency, as well as the adapter efficiency, was excellent, but residual consumption was above average.

Compared with devices from the same price range ($400 to $599), the Vivo X80 Lite 5G gets an excellent ranking thanks to a very good autonomy score and one of the best efficiency scores. However, the charging score is below average for this segment.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
0mAh 0W
(not included)
-
x
Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G 4500mAh 33W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
Google Pixel 6a 4410mAh 18W
(not included)
- OLED
1080 x 2400
Google Tensor

Autonomy

137

Vivo X80 Lite 5G

182

Wiko Power U30
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
87h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
59h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
36h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

153

Vivo X80 Lite 5G

189

Vivo Y72 5G

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

98

Vivo X80 Lite 5G

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

131

Vivo X80 Lite 5G

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

126

Vivo X80 Lite 5G

181

Realme GT Neo 3
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
61%
in 30 min
0h42
0 - 80%
1h04
Full charge

Full charge

115

Vivo X80 Lite 5G

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

139

Vivo X80 Lite 5G

182

Realme GT Neo 3

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

152

Vivo X80 Lite 5G

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Vivo X80 Lite 5G
4.2 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

140

Vivo X80 Lite 5G

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

158

Vivo X80 Lite 5G

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Vivo X80 Lite 5G Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/vivo-x80-lite-5g-battery-test/feed/ 0 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired BATTERY BATTERY
Google Pixel 7 Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/google-pixel-7-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/google-pixel-7-battery-test/#respond Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:34:59 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=133253 We put the Google Pixel 7 through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In this results summary, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 4355 mAh 30W charger (not included) 6.3-inch, [...]

The post Google Pixel 7 Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Google Pixel 7 through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In this results summary, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 4355 mAh
  • 30W charger (not included)
  • 6.3-inch, 1080 x 2400, 90 Hz OLED display
  • Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 8 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Google Pixel 7
98
battery
90

189

105

195

94

198

103
charging
102

184

105

182

121

205

92

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 1h
Battery life
Charging Time
1h00
80% Charging time
Charging Time
2h00
Full charging time
Quick Boost
2h43 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Charger has low residual consumption whether device is plugged in and fully charged or is unplugged
  • Decent autonomy when gaming

Cons

  • Low autonomy when calling during calibrated and on-the-go tests
  • High consumption when streaming music
  • Low gain in autonomy with a 5-minute charge
  • Very long wireless charging time (3 hours 46 minutes)

Despite a slightly smaller battery capacity and similar behavior, the Google Pixel 7 achieved a higher global score than the Pixel 6, thanks to improved efficiency. However, its overall autonomy is below average when compared with other devices in the High-end ($400-599) segment.

When testing each individual usage separately, the device still showed high consumption whether at home or on the go, but it put in a decent performance when gaming. Even though the device can use a 30W charger (not included), the Pixel 7’s wired charging was poor, as was its wireless charging. Moreover, a five-minute charge provided less than 3 hours of additional autonomy, which is low compared to other phones.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Google Pixel 7 4355mAh 30W
(not included)
23W OLED
1080 x 2400
Google Tensor G2
Google Pixel 6 4614mAh 30W
(not included)
21W OLED
1080 x 2400
Google Tensor
Xiaomi 12T 5000mAh 120W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1220 x 2712
Mediatek Dimensity 8100-Ultra

Autonomy

93

Google Pixel 7

182

Wiko Power U30
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
68h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
49h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
31h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

90

Google Pixel 7

189

Vivo Y72 5G

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

105

Google Pixel 7

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

94

Google Pixel 7

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

103

Google Pixel 7

181

Realme GT Neo 3
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
47%
in 30 min
1h00
0 - 80%
1h60
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
17%
in 30 min
2h22
0 - 80%
3h46
Full charge

Full charge

102

Google Pixel 7

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
Time to full charge

Quick boost

105

Google Pixel 7

182

Realme GT Neo 3

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

101

Google Pixel 7

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Google Pixel 7
4.4 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

121

Google Pixel 7

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

92

Google Pixel 7

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Google Pixel 7 Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/google-pixel-7-battery-test/feed/ 0 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Google Pixel 7 Pro Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/google-pixel-7-pro-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/google-pixel-7-pro-battery-test/#respond Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:26:10 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=133259 We put the Google Pixel 7 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In this results summary, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 5000 mAh 30W charger (not included) [...]

The post Google Pixel 7 Pro Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Google Pixel 7 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In this results summary, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
  • 30W charger (not included)
  • 6.7-inch, 1440 x 3120, 120 Hz OLED display
  • Google Tensor G2 (4 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 12 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Google Pixel 7 Pro
102
battery
105
autonomy
101

189

108

195

110

198

102
charging
101

184

103

182

112

205

83

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 4h
Battery life
Charging Time
1h03
80% Charging time
Charging Time
2h09
Full charging time
Quick Boost
2h34 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Charger has low residual consumption whether device is plugged in and fully charged or is unplugged
  • Good autonomy when streaming video
  • Decent autonomy when tested in calibrated mode

Cons

  • Poor autonomy when streaming music
  • Poor on-the-go performance
  • Low gain in autonomy after a 5-minute charge
  • Poor charge efficiency
  • Very long wireless charging time (4 hours 1 minute)

The Google Pixel 7 Pro performed better than its predecessor, the Google Pixel 6 Pro, particularly in autonomy and efficiency; however, its global battery score is below the average of our database as a whole. It managed to achieve an average performance for its segment (Ultra-premium, $800 and higher), largely because of a decent autonomy performance when testing each usage separately, especially for video streaming. Its charging and efficiency scores were very low, with long charging times for both wired (2 hours 9 minutes) and wireless (4 hours 1 minute) charging, and a poor boost in autonomy of only 2 hours 34 minutes for a 5-minute charge. The Pixel 7 Pro showed high consumption when streaming music and when on the go.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Google Pixel 7 Pro 5000mAh 30W
(not included)
23W OLED
1440 x 3120
Google Tensor G2
Google Pixel 6 Pro 5003mAh 30W
(not included)
23W OLED
1440 x 3120
Google Tensor Chip
Apple iPhone 14 Pro 3200mAh 20W
(not included)
15W OLED
1179 x 2556
Apple A16 Bionic

Autonomy

105

Google Pixel 7 Pro

182

Wiko Power U30
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
74h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
52h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
33h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

101

Google Pixel 7 Pro

189

Vivo Y72 5G

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

108

Google Pixel 7 Pro

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

110

Google Pixel 7 Pro

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

102

Google Pixel 7 Pro

181

Realme GT Neo 3
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
46%
in 30 min
1h03
0 - 80%
2h09
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
15%
in 30 min
2h37
0 - 80%
4h01
Full charge

Full charge

101

Google Pixel 7 Pro

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
Time to full charge

Quick boost

103

Google Pixel 7 Pro

182

Realme GT Neo 3

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

92

Google Pixel 7 Pro

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Google Pixel 7 Pro
4.8 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

112

Google Pixel 7 Pro

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

83

Google Pixel 7 Pro

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Google Pixel 7 Pro Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/google-pixel-7-pro-battery-test/feed/ 0 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Nothing Phone (1) Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/nothing-phone-1-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/nothing-phone-1-battery-test/#respond Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:12:25 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=132616 We put the Nothing Phone (1) through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 4500 mAh 33W charger (not included) 6.55-inch, [...]

The post Nothing Phone (1) Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Nothing Phone (1) through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 4500 mAh
  • 33W charger (not included)
  • 6.55-inch, 1080 x 2400, 120 Hz, OLED display
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 8 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Nothing Phone (1)
118
autonomy
118

189

110

195

122

198

119
charging
113

184

125

182

108

205

134

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 6h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h47
80% Charging time
Charging Time
1h57
Full charging time
Quick Boost
4h10 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Decent autonomy in moderate use
  • Excellent autonomy when calling, streaming music and video
  • Excellent power adapter efficiency
  • Low residual consumption of the wired charger when the device is fully charged and still plugged in
  • Low discharge currents overall

Cons

  • Poor autonomy during idle phase
  • Poor autonomy on the go, except when calling
  • Slow charging speed with both wired and wireless charger
  • Low charge efficiency

The Nothing Phone (1) showed decent autonomy in moderate use, but its consumption during the night was high, with an average 3% lost. When tested outside, the device struggled when scrolling on social apps and using the camera. Its autonomy in calibrated mode, however, was excellent, especially when calling, and streaming video and music.

The 45W charger struggled to replenish the battery device faster than our database average, taking almost 2 hour to fully charge the 4500 mAh battery. Indeed, the device supported only 33W, and the time between 100% displayed on the screen and the true full charge was very long at 49 minutes.

The charge efficiency was very low, even though the power adapter showed excellent efficiency. The residual consumption of the charger was excellent when the device was fully charged and still plugged in, but the charger itself, when plugged into an outlet, consumed more power than average.
Wireless charging was long, too, taking 2 hours and 41 minutes to fully charge the battery. The charge efficiency was average, and the residual consumption was slightly lower than average.
The discharge currents were low across almost all our use cases, meaning that the device is well-optimized, especially when calling, and streaming music and video.

When compared with devices from the same price range ($400 – $599), the Nothing Phone (1) gets a global score that is slightly above average, with autonomy and efficiency scores slightly above average as well, but a low charging score.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Nothing Phone(1) 4500mAh 33W
(not included)
15W OLED
1080 x 2400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
Google Pixel 6 4614mAh 30W
(not included)
21W OLED
1080 x 2400
Google Tensor
Xiaomi 12T 5000mAh 120W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1220 x 2712
Mediatek Dimensity 8100-Ultra

Autonomy

118

Nothing Phone (1)

182

Wiko Power U30
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
77h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
54h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
34h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

118

Nothing Phone (1)

189

Vivo Y72 5G

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

110

Nothing Phone (1)

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

122

Nothing Phone (1)

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

119

Nothing Phone (1)

181

Realme GT Neo 3
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
54%
in 30 min
0h47
0 - 80%
1h57
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
21%
in 30 min
1h49
0 - 80%
2h41
Full charge

Full charge

113

Nothing Phone (1)

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
Time to full charge

Quick boost

125

Nothing Phone (1)

182

Realme GT Neo 3

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

125

Nothing Phone (1)

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Nothing Phone (1)
4.6 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

108

Nothing Phone (1)

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

134

Nothing Phone (1)

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Nothing Phone (1) Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/nothing-phone-1-battery-test/feed/ 0 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Apple iPhone 14 Plus Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-14-plus-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-14-plus-battery-test/#respond Wed, 02 Nov 2022 12:38:13 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=132367 We put the Apple Iphone 14 Plus through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 4323 mAh 20W charger (not included) [...]

The post Apple iPhone 14 Plus Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Apple Iphone 14 Plus through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 4323 mAh
  • 20W charger (not included)
  • 6.7-inch, 1284 x 2778, 60 Hz, OLED display
  • Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 6 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Apple iPhone 14 Plus
128
battery
142
autonomy
150

189

141

195

131

198

108
charging
103

184

114

182

88

205

164

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 15h
Battery life
Charging Time
1h03
80% Charging time
Charging Time
2h29
Full charging time
Quick Boost
3h18 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Excellent performance during a typical usage scenario, with low discharge currents
  • Excellent autonomy in calibrated mode, especially when streaming videos
  • Very good autonomy when using GPS navigation on the go
  • Low residual consumption of both wired and wireless chargers
  • Decent wireless charge efficiency
  • Low discharge currents overall

Cons

  • Poor charging experience
  • Very low wired charge efficiency

The Apple iPhone 14 Plus reached an excellent global score but stood slightly below the iPhone 14 Pro Max. The score difference with the 14 Pro Max was mainly due to slightly lower performance during our typical usage scenario, but the results remained close.

The iPhone 14 Plus showed excellent performance during the typical usage scenario, with less than 2% lost per night on average. Outdoors, the performance was excellent, except when using the camera, where the autonomy was slightly below average. However, when testing in calibrated mode, the autonomy was above average across all our use cases, especially when streaming videos.

When it came to charging, the small 20W charger took 2 hours and 29 minutes to fill up the 4323 mAh battery. Similarly, the wireless charger took 2 hours and 54 minutes to fully charge the battery, which was longer than average. The residual consumption of both wired and wireless chargers was very low.
The wireless charge efficiency was decent, but the wired one was very low.

The discharge currents were very low overall, meaning that the device was well-optimized, whatever the use case.

Compared with devices from the Ultra-premium price range ($800+), the iPhone 14 Plus stands among the best, just below the iPhone 14 Pro Max, thanks to its excellent autonomy and efficiency. However, its charging score was among the lowest.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Apple iPhone 14 Plus 4323mAh 15W
(not included)
8W OLED Super Retina XDR
1284 x 2778
Apple A15 Bionic
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max 4323mAh 20W
(not included)
15W OLED
1290 x 2796
Apple A16 Bionic
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos) 4500mAh 45W
(not included)
15W OLED
1080 x 2340
Samsung Exynos 2200
Oppo Find X5 4800mAh 80W
(included)
30W OLED
1080 x 2400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G

Autonomy

142

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

182

Wiko Power U30
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
90h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
63h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
39h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

150

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

189

Vivo Y72 5G

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

141

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

131

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

108

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

181

Realme GT Neo 3
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
44%
in 30 min
1h03
0 - 80%
2h29
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
28%
in 30 min
1h41
0 - 80%
2h54
Full charge

Full charge

103

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
Time to full charge

Quick boost

114

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

182

Realme GT Neo 3

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

133

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Apple iPhone 14 Plus
3.7 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

88

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

164

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Apple iPhone 14 Plus Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-14-plus-battery-test/feed/ 0 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-14-pro-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-14-pro-battery-test/#respond Wed, 02 Nov 2022 12:31:09 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=132378 We put the Apple iPhone 14 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 3200 mAh 20W charger (not included) [...]

The post Apple iPhone 14 Pro Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Apple iPhone 14 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 3200 mAh
  • 20W charger (not included)
  • 6.1-inch, 1179 x 2556, 120 Hz, OLED display
  • Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 6 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Apple iPhone 14 Pro
119
battery
116
autonomy
111

189

130

195

119

198

112
charging
113

184

112

182

87

205

194

Best

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 6h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h52
80% Charging time
Charging Time
1h55
Full charging time
Quick Boost
3h11 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Decent autonomy when streaming music and video
  • Excellent autonomy when using GPS navigation and scrolling on social apps
  • Low residual consumption of both wired and wireless charger
  • Extremely low discharge currents

Cons

  • Poor autonomy when gaming and calling
  • Weak autonomy when using the camera on the go
  • Slow charging speed

The Apple iPhone 14 Pro showed very similar behavior to the iPhone 13 Pro, but its global score was slightly above its predecessor, and above the average of our database. The iPhone 14 Pro was tested with the “always-on display” mode turned off — a feature that we deactivate for all models in our tests for a fair comparison.

The autonomy was slightly above average despite its small 3200 mAh battery, which means that the device is well-optimized. Indeed, the discharge currents were very low across all our use cases, reaching the top spot in discharging. However, in terms of autonomy, the device struggled when gaming, calling, and using the camera. The typical usage scenario was average though, with only 1.33% lost per night. The performance when streaming video and music was decent, and the autonomy when using GPS navigation on the go was excellent.

The charging experience was poor, taking almost 2 hours to fill up the battery with the 20W wired charger, and 2 hours 19 minutes with the 15W wireless charger. The autonomy recovered after a 5-minute charge was only 3 hours and 9 minutes on average, which was far from the average of our database. The wireless charge efficiency was decent, but the wired charge efficiency was very low, one of the lowest in our database. The residual consumption of both wired and wireless chargers was well-controlled, with very low power.

Compared with devices from the same Ultra-premium price range ($800+), the iPhone 14 Pro’s global score was above-average because of its decent autonomy and excellent efficiency thanks to its top score in discharging. But the charging score remained very low.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Apple iPhone 14 Pro 3200mAh 20W
(not included)
15W OLED
1179 x 2556
Apple A16 Bionic
Apple iPhone 13 Pro 3095mAh 20W
(not included)
15W OLED
1170 x 2532
Apple A15 Bionic
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 5000mAh 45W
(not included)
15W AMOLED 2X
1440 x 3088
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000mAh 80W
(included)
50W (LTPO) OLED
1440 x 3216
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

Autonomy

116

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

182

Wiko Power U30
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
78h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
54h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
33h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

111

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

189

Vivo Y72 5G

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

130

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

119

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

112

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

181

Realme GT Neo 3
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
56%
in 30 min
0h52
0 - 80%
1h55
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
36%
in 30 min
1h28
0 - 80%
2h18
Full charge

Full charge

113

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
Time to full charge

Quick boost

112

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

182

Realme GT Neo 3

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

148

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3.4 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

87

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Best

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Apple iPhone 14 Pro Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-14-pro-battery-test/feed/ 0 Best Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless Wired Wireless Best
Asus ROG Phone 6 Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/asus-rog-phone-6-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/asus-rog-phone-6-battery-test/#respond Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:36:05 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=131760 We put the Asus ROG Phone 6 through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 6000 mAh 65W charger (included) 6.78-inch, [...]

The post Asus ROG Phone 6 Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Asus ROG Phone 6 through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 6000 mAh
  • 65W charger (included)
  • 6.78-inch, 1080 x 2448, 165 Hz, OLED display
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 256 GB + 12 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Asus ROG Phone 6
140
battery
155
autonomy
167

189

143

195

143

198

132
charging
121

184

145

182

143

205

105

194

Key performances

Charging Time
3 days
Battery life
Charging Time
0h35
80% Charging time
Charging Time
0h58
Full charging time
Quick Boost
6h02 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Outstanding in typical usage scenario
  • Very good autonomy during calibrated tests, especially when playing games, watching videos, and calling
  • Excellent autonomy when calling on the go
  • Excellent charge and adapter efficiency

Cons

  • Below-average autonomy when scrolling on social apps on the go
  • High residual consumption of the charger when the device was unplugged (charger itself plugged into an outlet)
  • High discharge current when streaming music

The Asus ROG Phone 6 showed outstanding autonomy in factory default mode in our battery tests. The device lasted more than three full days during the typical usage scenario (TUS), placing it among the best in our database. The same excellent experience was repeated in calibrated mode, especially when playing games and streaming videos. During the on-the-go tests, the device had very good autonomy when calling but a lower one when scrolling on social apps.

The 65W charger took less than 1 hour to fully charge the device, which was decent for the large 6000 mAh battery. A quick 5-minutes charge yielded 6 hours and 2 minutes of additional autonomy, which was above the average in our database.
The charger efficiency was decent, and the power adapter efficiency was excellent. This charger consumed little power when the device was fully charged and still plugged in, but its consumption when the device was unplugged was higher than average.
The Asus ROG Phone 6 had low discharge currents during all our test cases. However, when scrolling social apps, the discharge currents were high.

Compared with devices from the same price range ($800+), the Asus earned the top score thanks to its excellent autonomy. Charging and efficiency were good, too.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Asus ROG Phone 6 6000mAh 65W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2448
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro 5000mAh 65W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Black Shark 5 Pro 4650mAh 120W
(not included)
- OLED
1080 x 2400
Qualcomm 8 Gen 1

Autonomy

155

Asus ROG Phone 6

182

Wiko Power U30
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
103h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
72h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
45h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

167

Asus ROG Phone 6

189

Vivo Y72 5G

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

143

Asus ROG Phone 6

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

143

Asus ROG Phone 6

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

132

Asus ROG Phone 6

181

Realme GT Neo 3
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
72%
in 30 min
0h35
0 - 80%
0h58
Full charge

Full charge

121

Asus ROG Phone 6

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

145

Asus ROG Phone 6

182

Realme GT Neo 3

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

116

Asus ROG Phone 6

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Asus ROG Phone 6
4.3 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

143

Asus ROG Phone 6

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

105

Asus ROG Phone 6

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Asus ROG Phone 6 Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/asus-rog-phone-6-battery-test/feed/ 0 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired BATTERY BATTERY