We put the Sony Xperia 5 IV through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.
Overview
Key camera specifications:
- Primary:12MP 1/1.7″ sensor, f/1.7aperture lens, PDAF, OIS
- Ultra-wide: 12MP, 1/2.5″ sensor, f/2.2 aperture lens, PDAF
- Tele : 12MP, 1/3.5″ sensor, f/2.4 aperture lens, PDAF, OIS
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Sony Xperia 5 IV
119
camera
92
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Best: Huawei Mate 50 Pro (117)
112
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Best: Google Pixel 7 Pro (119)
101
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Best: Huawei Mate 50 Pro (116)
94
Oppo Find X5
Best: Oppo Find X5 (114)
91
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (115)
68
Google Pixel 6
Best: Google Pixel 6 (81)
55
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Best: Huawei Mate 50 Pro (80)
62
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (91)
79
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (116)
91
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Best: Huawei Mate 50 Pro (117)
68
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (115)
89
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (117)
96
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (117)
86
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Best: Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (115)
112
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Best: Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (118)
83
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 12S Ultra (86)
104
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (117)
Use cases & Conditions
Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.
Outdoor
Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)
Indoor
Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)
Lowlight
Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)
Friends & Family
Portrait and group photo & videos
Position in Global Ranking
45
th
4. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
7. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
13. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
19. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
19. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
27. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
29. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
126
33. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
37. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
39. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
43. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
43. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
51. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
116
54. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
54. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
63. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
65. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
65. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
69. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)
108
75. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
84. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
84. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
86. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
89. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
90. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
78
92. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
95. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
65
100. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
60
103. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
105. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
36
th
4. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
7. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
12. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
17. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
17. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
24. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
28. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
30. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
32. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
35. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
37. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
38. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
38. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
42. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
43. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
43. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
Pros
- Pleasant color rendering with warm white balance indoors
- Accurate and repeatable autofocus
- Accurate target exposure for standard conditions for photo and video
Cons
- Limited dynamic range with bright areas usually clipped
- Slightly long shooting time in all conditions making it difficult to capture the instant
- Long exposure time in default mode, frequently resulting in photos with motion blur
- Low level of details in video and chromatic noise, particularly visible in low light
The Sony Xperia 5 IV is a well-balanced phone that will deliver satisfying photos and videos taken in good light conditions.The main camera’s stabilization and the autofocus systems are two of its strong points. In this price range, the Xperia 5 IV is a good option for photographers who mainly shoot in the outdoors.
Sony Xperia 5 IV Camera Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph compares DXOMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.
Test summary
About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us on how to receive a full report.
Photo
121
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests
For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family, and landscape photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.
Sony Xperia 5 IV Photo scores vs Ultra-Premium
The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses.
Sony Xperia 5 IV – Pleasant colors, accurate target exposure on faces, but the dynamic range is limited, with bright areas that are clipped.
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ0EV Daylight Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 1000Lux with Daylight illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Zoom
111
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests
DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long-range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting the images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements of chart mages captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.
Sony Xperia 5 IV Zoom Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the right and Zooming-out scores on the left.
Video
113
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
About DXOMARK Camera Video tests
DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.
Sony Xperia 5 IV Video scores vs Ultra-Premium
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.
Sony Xperia 5 IV – Limited dynamic range but good target exposure and face-tracking capabilities.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.
English
中文
Display
Battery
DXOMARK invites our readership (you) to post comments on the articles on this website. Read more about our Comment Policy.