The Apple iPhone 13 Pro arrived on the market along with the rest of the iPhone 13 line in September 2021. Apart from a smaller screen, the 13 Pro otherwise shares the same features as the iPhone 13 Pro Max, and put in a similar performance in our Display protocol tests. This short review will focus on the almost negligible differences between the two models.
Key display specifications:
- 6.1″ OLED display
- Dimensions: 71.5 x 146.7 x 7.65 mm (2.82 x 5.78 x 0.30 inches)
- Resolution: 2532 x 1170 (460 ppi)
- Aspect ratio: 19.5:9 ratio
- Maximum refresh rate: 120 Hz
- Chipset: A15 Bionic
About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”)
Test summary
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
display
151
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (160)
134
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Best: Sony Xperia 5 IV (163)
149
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
Best: Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) (162)
142
Huawei P40 Pro
Best: Huawei P40 Pro (155)
140
OnePlus 9
Best: OnePlus 9 (165)
129
LG Wing
Best: LG Wing (149)
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking
5
th
1. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
4. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
12. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
14. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
16. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
16. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
16. Vivo X80 Pro (Mediatek)
134
19. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
19. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
19. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
19. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
24. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
24. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
28. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
33. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
33. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
39. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
39. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
42. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
48. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
48. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
63. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
63. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
67. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
80. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
85. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
89. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
94. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
97. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
103. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
105. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
106. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
114. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
115. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
117. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
5
th
1. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
4. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
10. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
11. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
13. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
13. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
13. Vivo X80 Pro (Mediatek)
134
16. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
16. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
19. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
19. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
24. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
24. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
28. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
28. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
31. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
40. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
45. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
49. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
52. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
Pros
- The device ensures a proper readability of pictures, indoors and outdoors.
- HDR10 content is well managed, with proper brightness, high contrast, and good color management.
- The device feels smooth and no frame drops are visible.
- Colors are maintained when the device is viewed on angle.
Cons
- Brightness is too low in low-light conditions for photos in the gallery, web pages, and SDR video content.
- The device sometimes shows a yellow cast.
- The blue light filter has a strong impact on color.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro came in just a point behind the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, which is currently the top-ranked phone in our Display protocol database.
Only very slight differences separated the two smartphones. On the one hand, the iPhone 13 Pro’s color rendering of images viewed in indoor conditions showed a slightly more orange cast than seen on the 13 Pro Max, as illustrated below:
Indoor color: Apple iPhone 13 Pro (top), Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (bottom)
(Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only)
On the other hand, the iPhone 13 Pro’s display had better color uniformity across the entire screen than the Pro Max, as seen below:
Color uniformity: Apple iPhone 13 Pro (left), Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (right)
(Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only)
For all other attributes, the two iPhone 13 models performed identically; and in fact, the only reason the 13 Pro comes in just behind the 13 Pro Max is that the 13 Pro has a smaller screen-to-body ratio.
For more detailed information about the iPhone 13 Pro’s performance, please see our review of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max here.
DXOMARK invites our readership (you) to post comments on the articles on this website. Read more about our Comment Policy.